Regardless of varied consumer preferences, there are surely enough wine options available to satisfy nearly every American of legal drinking age (21+). Whether these consumers are riding the rosé wave or enjoying varietals like chardonnay, merlot or cabernet sauvignon, one thing is for certain: Label design is a key purchase driver in an increasingly crowded wine market.
As of June 2017, more than 3,500 new wine products had hit shelves in the last year, representing 14% of all items in the category and 4.5% of category sales volume. But the influx isn’t just giving consumers an array of new brands to choose from; it’s forcing retailers to make tough choices about how to use their finite shelf space.
With this many options at consumers’ fingertips, wine manufacturers and retailers need to understand the factors that influence wine purchase decisions. And in the wine category, where traditional media spending is low, the “advertising” that happens at the shelf is particularly important.
Moreover, according to Nielsen’s Beverage Alcohol Category Shopping Fundamentals study, only 29% of consumers know which brand they intend to buy before they enter a store. The remaining 71% of consumers are making their decisions as they peruse the options on the shelf. So what can wine manufacturers take to stand out and land in consumers’ baskets?
Conduct a pack health assessment
Understanding package design trends is critical, and that means assessing design performance on a variety of dimensions. First, does a design grab consumers’ attention quickly? In a recent label analysis of 20 wine brands that utilized eye-tracking technology, 57% more consumers saw the most visible bottle than the least-visible bottle within the first few seconds of looking. Since consumers can’t consider purchasing a wine that they don’t see or notice, strong standout is a key requirement for effective design.
Once consumers notice a bottle, the label needs to compel them to purchase it. For this reason, manufacturers should assess to what extent their designs reflect the brand’s personality and effectively convey key messages. Which elements are working well, and which aren’t?
Rely on market feedback and avoid personal bias
It’s incredibly difficult to predict how consumers will respond to package designs. For example, which of the package designs below would wine buyers view as the “most fun”?
According to Nielsen’s recent wine label analysis, wine buyers found Amour to appear the most fun. So what makes a label “fun”? In the case of Amour, respondents described the font and tilt of the “A” as fun and inviting. They also liked the use of the word “Amour,” which they found recognizable and associated with love. You can test your hunches further with this interactive infographic.
Trying to guess how consumers will react to packaging is a big challenge for manufacturers. In fact, more than half of fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) professionals cite subjective decision-making within their company as a top complaint when asked about the biggest pain points in their company’s design process; 75% indicated that design decisions at their companies are made based on judgment or design by committee—whether it be group consensus (33%), qualitative focus groups (55%) or the infamous senior executive favorite (53%). The real way forward, however, as with most other aspects of new product development, is through quantitative consumer feedback. It’s the only dependable way to understand how a package design will perform in market.
Explore more design directions
In studying more than 90 client package redesign initiatives, Nielsen uncovered an interesting finding: As the number of designs evaluated increases, so too does the performance on key packaging metrics, including consumer preference and the ability to stand-out. The unfortunate reality, however, is that most brands evaluate three or fewer design directions, while only 15% explore more than four options.
In Nielsen’s wine label analysis, the most preferred package redesign was Del Rio Vineyards rosé—with nearly twice as many consumers preferring the new design to the old one. The Del Rio team explored ten initial design directions—much more than the typical brand—then iterated further on a subset of those designs.